- Brand
- DUOPORE
- Category
- Operations
- Primary Subcategory
- Notes & Personal Knowledge Bases
Integration details
Description
Counts user-recorded interruptions by your category and context labels and sums explicitly entered minutes. Reports repeated categories without diagnosis, psychological profiling or reading communications. Supply simple labels rather than raw chats or sensitive information. Uses only adult user-controlled facts; review the result. No external lookup, storage or sending. Uses explicitly supplied structured inputs. Server computations are transient; the standalone website computes locally in your browser. Review the output before exporting it. No persistent account records, external source retrieval, sending, transactions or paid model calls. CSV/JSON review and export are available on the standalone website. MCP requests are capped at 128 KiB and computed responses at 256 KiB; individual field and record limits also apply.
- Integration type
- Plugin
- Verification status
- Not applicable
- Platform
- ChatGPT
- Primary Subcategory
- Notes & Personal Knowledge Bases
- Secondary Subcategories
- None listed
- Brand
- DUOPORE
- Access
- No account required
- First tracked
- 2026-11-02
- Tool count
- 1
- Market
- US
The Primary Subcategory used for this profile’s headline score.
Other Subcategories where the Integration is listed.
Your score is coming
ChatGPT now suggests Plugins on its own when they match a user's request.Your Plugin Discovery Score measures how often yours appears, and it will show here as soon as it’s ready.
What discovery looks like

Get alerts for Distraction Pattern Counts
Get updates when Distraction Pattern Counts’s Discoverability Score or category rank changes.
Competing in ChatGPT Notes & Personal Knowledge Bases
View Category1 tool agents can invoke
Distraction Pattern Counts ChatGPT Plugin FAQ
How the directory, categories and Discoverability Score work.
Read the methodologyHow do I improve Distraction Pattern Counts's ChatGPT Plugin discoverability?
The levers are the listing surface agents actually read: names, descriptions, keywords, tool metadata, and registry health. Which lever matters depends on where discovery breaks, which is what continuous measurement shows.
What are Distraction Pattern Counts alternatives on ChatGPT?
As of 2026-11-02, Distraction Pattern Counts competes with #memory, Agent KB, AINOTA, Albo, ARR Family, Atlavium, AudioPen, Banyan and 57 more in ChatGPT Notes & Personal Knowledge Bases, ranked by public Discoverability Score.
Where is this profile measured?
This profile uses the geography attached to the latest public registry snapshot: US. Locale tags are intentionally omitted.